Re: 2.2.0 wishlist
The SethMeister (consp05@binghamton.edu)
Sat, 15 Jun 1996 04:35:59 -0400
At 04:03 AM 6/15/96 +0200, you wrote:
>
>On Fri, 14 Jun 1996, Matti E Aarnio wrote:
>
>> > > I think you may have a tough time finding that. Supposedly, NTFS is a c1
>> > > (supposedly soon to be c2) secure file system, which means that no OS
>> > > except for NT is supposed to be able to read/write from it.
>>
>> No, Win-NT WITHOUT NETWORKING may be able to get C1 classification,
>> and perhaps even C2, if MS implements all the necessary audit trail
>...
Perhaps? Window NT 3.5 has been certified C2 [PAST TENSE].
>> of the disk reveals anything is by use of the encryption, and
>> the NTFS is NOT encrypted!
>
This is not needed for C2. I know yall love microsoft bashing, but
faulting them for this is baseless. [And no i dont work for them :)].
-S
>So I still thing it would be nice with NTFS r/w support in some of the
>comming kernel versions.
That's what I [and hopefully others who will join] are workin' on :).