Re: Does ufs really work?

loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de
Mon, 15 Jul 1996 10:11:50 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Vote for Linux."
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: NFS caching patch."
In reply to: Bryn Paul Arnold Jones: "Re: 2.0.6 breaks HTTPd 1.4.1"
Next in thread: Jared Mauch: "Re: Does ufs really work?"

In article <4sbpqt$s71@nz12.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>,
Olaf Erb <erb@inss1.etec.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote:
>I just tried to mount an ufs from FreeBSD, but there's something really
>broken:
[...]
>ufs_read_super: fucking Sun blows me
>
>What's going on here? (btw, it was 2.0.5, same result with realier kernels)

I understand the ufs/ffs versions of SunOS 4/5 and FreeBSD are mutually
incompatible, such that even FreeBSD cannot mount Solaris partitions.
AFAIK, ufs support in Linux was tested only with SunOS disks.

Regards,
Martin

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Vote for Linux."
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: NFS caching patch."
In reply to: Bryn Paul Arnold Jones: "Re: 2.0.6 breaks HTTPd 1.4.1"
Next in thread: Jared Mauch: "Re: Does ufs really work?"