2.0.9 versus 2.0.10 : fs/isofs/inode.c

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Wayne Brown: "Re: finger @linux.cs.helsinki.fi doesn't work"
Previous message: Stramaglia, Carlo: ".rhosts for root user"
Next in thread: Eberhard Moenkeberg: "Re: 2.0.9 versus 2.0.10 : fs/isofs/inode.c"
Maybe reply: Eberhard Moenkeberg: "Re: 2.0.9 versus 2.0.10 : fs/isofs/inode.c"

Dr. Werner Fink (werner@suse.de)
Mon, 29 Jul 1996 12:44:50 +0200

Hi,

what's wrong with the patch for fs/isofs/inode.c done in 2.0.9?
The patch was given by Bernhard Kaindl for CDs with multibe sessions.

Werner