Re: Quick question.

Joe Vaughan (joev@autodealing.com)
Sat, 14 Sep 96 16:02:35 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrew Walker: "Re: memory testing [was: Re: General protection fault in kswapd in 2.0.18]"
Previous message: Andreas Muck: "Re: 2.0.15 compiling troubles"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Quick question."
Next in thread: Tom Hammersley: "Re: Quick question."

Some time in September, Alan Cox said:
> > I'd appreciate peoples comments and thoughts on this. I think it would
> > be a very worthwhile project that would eventually lead to a much
> > larger userbase for linux as a desktop OS.
>
> Be very very careful, the linux probes are in a very specific order to work
> right. Its taken a lot of testing and a lot of people to get it tuned

This I know. However I can't quite figure out the order in which
things are probed. If anyone knows of any place this is documented
I'd appreciate a pointer.

Cheers.
JoeV

-- 
Joe Vaughan  / joev@autodealing.com  / +353 1 6766455
" ! Cannot store The Internet in the recycle bin... "
  -- Windows 95 hints that the 'Infobahn' may not
     be environmentally friendly

Next message: Andrew Walker: "Re: memory testing [was: Re: General protection fault in kswapd in 2.0.18]"
Previous message: Andreas Muck: "Re: 2.0.15 compiling troubles"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Quick question."
Next in thread: Tom Hammersley: "Re: Quick question."