Re: Possible improvement to pipe throughput

Albert Cahalan (albert@ccs.neu.edu)
Fri, 27 Sep 1996 17:06:58 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mark H. Wood: "Re: Money (was Re: test version of 2.1.0 available (fwd))"
Previous message: Mark Levitt: "Re: your mail"
Maybe in reply to: Malcolm Beattie: "Possible improvement to pipe throughput"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Possible improvement to pipe throughput"

> Linus had done such an implementation. If I remeber correctly
> he thought it was only good for high benchmark numbers without
> real world significance.

High benchmark numbers have real world significance.
They make Linux look good, so more people install it.

Next message: Mark H. Wood: "Re: Money (was Re: test version of 2.1.0 available (fwd))"
Previous message: Mark Levitt: "Re: your mail"
Maybe in reply to: Malcolm Beattie: "Possible improvement to pipe throughput"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: Possible improvement to pipe throughput"