Re: adding scsi devices

Theodore Y. Ts'o (tytso@mit.edu)
Thu, 19 Dec 1996 18:29:34 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "socket.h et all"
Previous message: Henrik Storner: "IP forwarding broken in 2.1.16 ?"
In reply to: Dan Merillat: "Oops in 2.0.23"
Next in thread: tyson@rwii.com: "Re: adding scsi devices"

From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 18:22:04 +0000 (GMT)

Anyone have any opinions when we should stop talking about >256fds, and
32bit device numbers and bite the bullet and add them ?

I'm too busy until sometime after the USENIX conference.....

but while we're at it, we should increase the size of sigmask_t (so we
can increase the number of signals). All of these have varying levels
of compatibility problems.

- Ted

Next message: Richard B. Johnson: "socket.h et all"
Previous message: Henrik Storner: "IP forwarding broken in 2.1.16 ?"
In reply to: Dan Merillat: "Oops in 2.0.23"
Next in thread: tyson@rwii.com: "Re: adding scsi devices"