Re: Machine friendly format for /proc files

. Tethys (tethys@lonnds.ml.com)
Tue, 18 Feb 1997 16:16:16 +0000


> Hrm. that wasn't very clear. :) I just think that if you provided
>ioctl's and left the text support in there, no question about it, I'd stick
>with the text in my applications unless a *useful* procps lib were made that
>would use the ioctl's. In which case, switching would be easy as pie.

My vote would be to have ioctls with a procps library library to get
at the necessary info. As you say, it would have to be done well and
be useful.

Tet

--
``Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human. He is at
  best a tolerable subhuman who has learned to wear shoes, bathe and
  not make messes in the house.''      -- from the notebooks of Lazarus Long
--------------------+--------------+----------------------------------------
tethys@ml.com       |  Micro$oft:  | Linux,  the choice of a GNU generation.
tet@astradyne.co.uk | Just say no! | See http://www.uk.linux.org for details