On Sun, 23 Feb 1997 shendrix@escape.widomaker.com wrote:
>
> In message <Pine.LNX.3.95q.970223132425.792A-100000@azuth.vol.it>, Riccardo Fac
> chetti writes:
>
> > Now the idea.
> > Why not have an (I called) "adaptive" or if you prefer (I don't :)
> > "dynamic" swap file, managed in kernel space, that can grow and shrink
> > when memory is needed and/or released by someone ?
>
> [ snip ]
>
> You just described the swapping used by OS/2 and NeXTSTEP. No doubt
> others use the same technique.
>
> It is slower than a fixed swap partition on a raw device. Some people still
> prefer it.
>
> It will not solve the ``problem'' with overcommit.
>
>