> > This is hardly a situation that is calculated to make me feel
> > comfortable. :-)
>
> What does that mean?
> Does that mean that you just dont care about the ext2 corruptions problem?
> Does that mean that you feel you attacked about this problem?
I think Ted was just saying it doesn't give him warm fuzzy feelings that
the only SCSI driver he really trusts for Linux is the Buslogic. In a
perfect world, all the developers would have infinite free time to work on
drivers and full cooperation from the hardware producers, and all drivers
would be 100% stable. Unfortunately, that's not the world we're in.
> Do you want scsi maintainers of other drivers (you indirectly said they are
> bad implemented) give up from Linux?
I seriously doubt that is anthing like to the message he meant to
express.
> Quite frankly, do you want next Linux 2.2 only supports BusLogic scsi boards?
That would be a really sad state of affairs for Linux...one supported
brand of SCSI cards.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr.
________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______