> Yesterday I patched my 2.0.30 with pre-patch-2.0.31 (to get my new 3COM
> 900 working). Twice since then I have got "try_to_free_page: ... sleep
> instead of fail" messages. It happened when I ran fsck and another time
> when I did "find -name \*.c|xargs grep "try_to_free"" to locate the
> message in the kernel source.
I wonder why the "stable" version of the kernel (2.0) has had almost as
many patches as the "devel" (2.1) version, and it's still full of problems?
Michael
-- Michael Nelson nelson@seahunt.imat.com San Francisco, CA michaeln@csd.sgi.com"Talking about music is like dancing about architecture" - Frank Zappa