Re: pre-patch-2.0.31 try_to_free_page() messages
eyal (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au)
Sun, 01 Jun 1997 23:52:52 +1000
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I wonder why the "stable" version of the kernel (2.0) has had almost as
> > many patches as the "devel" (2.1) version, and it's still full of problems?
>
> Full of ?
>
> Have you got some we missed
>
> 2.0.pre31 + patches should be pretty much solid for everyone except for that
> one memory allocation issue. Are you seeing otherwise ?
What is the current 'official' pre31 patch collection? Maybe it is time
for
a pre31-2 just to be clear.
Is SMP supposed to be stable now?
--
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@eyal.emu.id.au)