Re: 2.1.42

david parsons (o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s)
7 Jun 1997 01:18:28 -0700


In article <linux.kernel.19970606013425.11868@msu.edu>,
Aaron Tiensivu <tiensivu@pilot.msu.edu> wrote:
>> setups just for grins? First we had someone who decided it was time to
>> break everything that uses procps, and now this. I have a 386 with 8MB
>
>Cry me a river. Procps had a good year to get rid of the old code.

A year isn't that long; 4-5 years is better from a commercial
standpoint.

(Though I'm still finding things that broke when I moved WebShield
from a 1.2.13 kernel to 2.0.27; many of them appear to be badly
written applications, so I don't shed too many tears for them,
particularly since some of the revisions to the public interfaces
are additions that well-behaved code won't care about.)

____
david parsons \bi/ Just another author of commercial Linux code.
\/