Re: 2.0.31-pre-patch-6 and gadi's patch

Richard A. Soderberg (richards@dnsi.net)
Sun, 17 Aug 1997 00:04:47 -0700 (PDT)


Comes to mind to wonder that I used 30 megs RAM max doing a
make -j zImage modules on 2.1.49 with 78 different diffs in 33 files..
But this isn't 2.0.31-6 :)

Richard

On 16 Aug 1997, Zlatko Calusic wrote:

> Date: 16 Aug 1997 22:03:52 +0200
> From: Zlatko Calusic <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr>
> To: Joel Gallun <joel@lorax.dc-sage.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> Subject: Re: 2.0.31-pre-patch-6 and gadi's patch
>
> Joel Gallun <joel@lorax.dc-sage.org> writes:
>
> > I built a kernel from a clean 2.0.31-pre-patch-6 and Gadi's
> > patch to memory management and did a 'make -j zImage'. It
> > died with 'virtual memory exhusted' compiling the fs directory.
> >
> > There were no kernel messages in dmesg or syslog.
> >
> > 16mb ram + 32 mb swap.
> >
> > joel
> >
>
> In fact, patch has nothing to do with "memory exhaustion".
> To compile kernel with "make -j" you need almost 100MB of virtual
> memory space, so your 48 just wasn't enough.
>
> You can try with "make -j 10" with your memory configuration.
>
> Or you can increase your swap space.
>
> --
> Posted by Zlatko Calusic E-mail: <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The world is coming to an end. Please log off.
>

-- http://www.dnsi.net/