Re: Solaris

SethMeister G. (seth@home.com)
Sat, 11 Oct 1997 14:22:59 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Chris Powell: "Re: Strange portmap/NFS error in 2.1.x"
Previous message: Adam D. Bradley: "Re: [linux-security] Malicious Linux modules (fwd)"

> > These responses and comments are based on Solarsi 2.5 and 2.5.1,
> > right?
> > 2.6 is much improved and they are getting much better as time goes
> > on. It's a relatively young OS and they have only really been
> > getting serious on it in the past 2 years, so give 'em some time.
> > Remember when Linux was a baby? :)
> Please!
> Solaris 386 is actually the venerable Interactive Unix, bought by
> Sun.
> As such (even forgetting the USL ancestry) it has been around some
> years now, almost as many as SCO.

Believe it or not, it has gone through so many changes that it bears
almost no resemblance to IU anymore.

-S

Next message: Chris Powell: "Re: Strange portmap/NFS error in 2.1.x"
Previous message: Adam D. Bradley: "Re: [linux-security] Malicious Linux modules (fwd)"