Re: Progress on knfsd

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: MPI for Linux"
Previous message: John G. Alvord: "Re: MOD_INC_USE_COUNT"
In reply to: Achim Oppelt: "Re: 2048 byte block size problems"

Richard Henderson (rth@dot.cygnus.com)
Tue, 11 Nov 1997 01:52:28 -0800

On Mon, Nov 10, 1997 at 08:54:43AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> 64bit ino_t in the future (not I hope that far either) will double that.

In his next message Bill gets down to 1 pointer, 3 ino_t, 1 dev_t,
in which there is room for a 48-bit ino_t. A nice interim size.