Re: [PATCH] Intel clock speed detection

Brian Roberson (brianr@bst.ml.org)
Sun, 28 Dec 1997 03:26:10 -0600


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1

same thing here, illegal instruction on Cyrix 6x96PR200MX

while we are on the subject..

if I cat cpuinfo.... it reports a PPro a step (and a bunch of flags)

yet I have been told to compile kernel with 486 optimizations,

I was told it compiles smaller and is faster than if I compiled pent

or ppro,

I understand why it will be smaller kernel, but not faster, why is

that??

At 12:57 AM 12/28/97 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Dec 1997, Harald Milz wrote:

>> Robert Woodcock (rcw@oz.net) wrote:

>> > instead of 100. (I gave this program to several other people

with pentiums

>> > and it seems to consistently report either high and low

depending on the

>> > system.)

>> Doesn't work on a Cyrix P166+ (Illegal Instruction).

>

>Seems to work fine on AMD K6.

>

>-Dan

>

>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0

Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNKYbMQdWY6QJVOq9EQJ2XwCfTSedobpB1d8psu3GemOzb4w0UF8An0v0

MbjCP27XcnM4RnKVkZNPVRrL

=klj0

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<center>Brian Roberson brianr@bst.ml.org

BrainStorm Technologies info@bst.ml.org

See what bill has to say about his "no bug" software!!

http://www.bst.ml.org/nobugs.html (mirrored)

Just try it.... you'll like it

LiNUX http://www.linux.org/

</center>