Re: no need for a devfs
Christophe Dupre (cdupre@risq.qc.ca)
Wed, 07 Jan 1998 11:54:37 -0500
>
> Well, you would have to rerun makedev software every time module is
> inserted. Advantage of devfs was that it was up-to-date without
> needing to run makedev after every change. devfs also might have
> chance to solve scsi naming problems.
What would be good also would be a mount/umount suite using /proc/mounts instead of /etc/mtab... :-)
Oh well, I'll probably just do that someday...