Re: devlinks: an alternative to devfs

ketil@ii.uib.no
08 Jan 1998 12:00:34 +0100


Kevin Lentin <kevinl@cs.monash.edu.au> writes:

> Maybe I didn't quote enough. The problem being discussed was that if you
> had devfs mounted twice you want a way to tell the system to not put new
> devices in a chrooted devfs. I was suggesting a 'nocreate' option in the
> devfs that effectively closes it. So when you create a chrooted filesystem
> you can remove some devices you don't like, create a few you think might
> turn up later that you do like and then 'close' the filesystem.

But you want the devices that disappear during unloading of a kernel
module to reappear when the module is reloaded. And you want to be able
to mount/unmount the directory at will without having to run some script
to configure the correct devices - don't you?

~kzm

-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants