Then would would IMHO be most logical to have
/dev/sd/c0b0t4l0s1
/dev/st/c0b0t5
/dev/scd/c0b0t6
(I personally would prefer the controller/bus/target/lun/slice scheme)
and
/dev/id/b0l0s1 (primary IDE bus, master)
/dev/it/b1l1 (secondary IDE, slave)
/dev/icd/b0l1 (primary, slave)
(well, what corresponds correctly to the SCSI naming scheme ? perhaps
not _b_us, but _c_ontroller and _t_arget instead of _l_un ? feel free
to add your .02)
and why not
/dev/fd/0 ? /dev/ft/1 ?
What about the special fd devices one needs for formatting ???
Just a few incomplete thoughts ...
Steffen
-- name : Steffen Grunewald | disclaimer: My opinions are mine. email : steffen(at)gfz-potsdam.de | You can rent them. Ask me. snail : GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, PB 2.5, Albert-Einstein-Straße, Telegrafenberg Haus G, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany tel : (+49)-331-288 1245 | quotation (Pablo Picasso): fax : (+49)-331-288 1266 | Computers are useless. URL : http://www.gfz-potsdam.de | They only can give you answers.