Re: transparent proxy not operationalal in 2.1
Mike Tubby G8TIC (mike@thorcom.com)
Sat, 31 Jan 1998 13:43:21 +0000
At 21:28 30/01/98 +0300, you wrote:
>In article <19980130161326.43332@math.fu-berlin.de> you wrote:
>: Yes, I know, I have found a few mailing list archives about transparent
>: proxying that say that it is inoperational in 2.1, but apparently nobody
>: bothers? The mails indicated that it's broken for over a _year_ now and
>: it still does not work. Can this be? Does nobody use transparent
>: proxying?
>
>Yes, you are the first who is bothered by it
>(at least in this mailing list)
>Nobody asked to repair it, so that I saw no reasons to be bothered too :-)
>If new socket hashing scheme did not break it too, I can repair it.
>But I need someone who is ready to test it.
>
>Alexey Kuznetsov
>
Just to put my hand up on this one! Transparrent Proxy is *VERY* *VERY*
important to me and several organisations that I build and maintain Linux
boxes for.
No Transparrent Proxy = No Linux! Well, actually means staying with
Linux 2.0 - so, please fix it!!!!!!!!!
Regards
Mike
--
Michael J Tubby B.Sc. G8TIC
Technical Director, Thorcom Systems Limited
Tel: 01 905 756700 (intl: +44 1 905 756 700)
Fax: 01 905 755777 (intl: +44 1 905 755 777)
Web: http://www.thorcom.com
Email: mike@thorcom.com