Re: What is accepted into the standard kernel sources ?

David Schwartz (davids@webmaster.com)
Wed, 4 Feb 1998 10:39:24 -0500


But don't count on the free software community buying your boards if you
won't tell them what they're buying. That's the difference between the
stereotypical 'Linux guy' and the stereotypical 'Windows guy'.

DS

>The trend today among hardware manufacturers is to cut costs
>by moving tasks formerly done in hardware to host software.
>More powerful host processors are making this possible. For
>example, you could build a modem that consists of a line
>interface and a D/A and A/D converter pair. Modulation and
>demodulation, ie. the hard part in building a modem, would be
>implemented in host software. Compared to the case where a
>modem is implemented using a signal processor executing code
>from mask ROM, why should the modem maker not be worried about
>giving away something valuable to the competition by
>publishing the source code?
>
>Another example are passive ISDN boards, which typically
>consist of two Siemens chips plus an address decoder. The hard
>part in providing a ready-to-go ISDN solution is no the
>production of the ISDN boards, but the host software doing all
>the signaling and data transfer according to various
>protocols. There are several manufacturers producing almost
>identical ISDN boards. Don't tell me it wouldn't be an
>advantage to competing ISDN board makers if a manufacturer
>would make his driver software available in source form for
>the competitors to look at and borrow parts of.
>
>--
>Johan Myreen
>jem@iki.fi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu