> Just to make Alan's point a little more clear: the owner of a work
> (such as the owner of the firmware) can release the same work under
> multiple different copyrights. So in order to do what you want, you
> need two copyrights, the GPL and some business boilerplate. You slap
> the business one on the firmware that stays in house and the GPL on the
> source that you submit to the linux kernel. Everybody gets what they
> want - the fact that the two copies of the code differ only by copyright
> oesn't matter in the eyes of the law - they are both valid.
Exactly, except you are talking about licenses, not copyrights.
Eric Hoeltzel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu