Not blinded, just indifferent. I don't want GGI in the kernel
because I don't want to waste space on my system for it's code.
Not that space is an issue, I have many megabytes free. I just
object to having to waste any of it just because some bimbo
wants graphics.
>
> many programmers would love to have very simple low level
> graphics interface that does not take too much time to learn and
> is fast.
>
> My personal opinion as an user who has used X windows
> for 6 years, is that X windows is dead system and keeping
> it as only choise for graphical programs and multimedia
> seriously limites interest for making graphical programs
> for Linux.
As it should be. Graphics should be an add-on for those who want
to use them. Not forced on the rest of us who don't want 'em.
I don't use X and I won't use GGI, so I will object to having either
in the kernel.
-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Bill Broadhurst | Independent contract Engineer. (619)296-3710 | BIOS, Firmware, & Diagnostics. bbroad@CX492564-a.dt1.sdca.home.com | Finger for PGP 5.0 public key. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu