Re: GGI debate and etc.

ketil@ii.uib.no
26 Feb 1998 11:09:50 +0100


Bill Broadhurst <bbroad@CX492564-a.dt1.sdca.home.com> writes:

> Besides, the code is in the tree whether it's compiled or not. THAT's
> to what I object.

Any reason you can't just rm(1) it? And use cvs to update your tree -
last time I looked it wouldn't create new directories unless you told it
to.

Perhaps it's time to make the kernel *source* more modular?

~kzm

-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu