Re: 2.0.33 bzImage booting errors

Edward R. Hartmann (erh@shell.flinet.com)
Mon, 23 Mar 1998 03:25:57 -0500 (EST)

Well, afiak, its only 2.0.33, because with 2.0.32 i never used bzimage.
The only reason i have to use it now is because of the fat32 patch..
Even with everything that can be compiled as modules modularized, its
still 520k..
The system this is happening to is a Fujitsu Lifebook 520 notebook (if
that actually means anything to anyone)
Back in the day of like rh4.0 and 2.1.40 some odd kernels, bz worked...
but that was the last time i tried it, so i dont exactly have an up to
date experience with making bz kernels...

On Sun, 22 Mar 1998, George Bonser wrote:

>
> If it is any comfort to you, I have one that does the same thing. Old
> Calvin does not like bzimage at all. I have linux running on 4 systems
> here, only the one does that. Does yours do that with only 2.0.33 or with
> any kernel?
>
> The old system that does this is a P60 5-volt Acer manufactured
> motherboard Piece-o-Crap sold as a Compudyne. I think CompUSA has them on
> perpetual clearance. I bought that one three years ago and they still had
> them at the same price last year.
>
>
> George Bonser
> Just be thankful that Microsoft does not manufacture pharmaceuticals.
> http://www.debian.org
> Debian/GNU Linux ... the maintainable operating system.
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu