David Woodhouse pointed out the details in his last message.
> > That's the point. I don't like blocking libc 5 access to the 17th SCSI
> > disc. We don't *have* to do that. There is a way of supporting more
> > than 16 SCSI discs and *still* give access to all those discs with
> > libc 5. The same scheme would even work for for libc 4.
>
> These will be ugly hack which will become an ugly nightmare at some
> point.
Erm, what ugly hack are you referring to?
Regards,
Richard....
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu