Re: mem=3D64MB oh yes! mem=3D128MB oh no! (2.0.34pre16)

Mark Lehrer (mark@lehrer.nlcomm.com)
Fri, 22 May 1998 07:39:48 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Guest section DW: "Re: Boot lock on 2.1.103"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "NE*0000 Fixes for 2.1.103 SMP and NonSMP"
Next in thread: Ben Pfaff: "Re: mem=3D64MB oh yes! mem=3D128MB oh no! (2.0.34pre16)"
Reply: Ben Pfaff: "Re: mem=3D64MB oh yes! mem=3D128MB oh no! (2.0.34pre16)"

How is "mem=3D128M" different from just saying "mem=128M"? Or how
about "SMP=3D1"?

Thanks,
Mark

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Guest section DW: "Re: Boot lock on 2.1.103"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "NE*0000 Fixes for 2.1.103 SMP and NonSMP"
Next in thread: Ben Pfaff: "Re: mem=3D64MB oh yes! mem=3D128MB oh no! (2.0.34pre16)"
Reply: Ben Pfaff: "Re: mem=3D64MB oh yes! mem=3D128MB oh no! (2.0.34pre16)"