Re: 2.0.34 bug?

Agus Budy Wuysang (fswmis@rad.net.id)
Fri, 12 Jun 1998 21:38:50 +0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mike A. Harris: "Re: Remote fork() and Parallel Programming"
Previous message: Alex Buell: "[OFFTOPIC] glibc troubles"
Maybe in reply to: Agus Budy Wuysang: "2.0.34 bug?"

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Can anyone confirm this bug?:
>
> Not a bug
>
> > *Non-root* user can NOT execute any dynamically
> > link binaries if /lib/ld-linux.so.1 has no execute
> > permission (say 0444)?
>
> Correct. This is a fix not a bug.
>
> Alan

Hmmm, I wonder whether the execute permission bits of
libXXXX.so.x.x.x should be honoured too?

(I can still execute prog even if my libxxxx.so has only
read permission as non-root)

-- 
+---| Netscape Communicator 4.x |---| Powered by Linux 2.0.x |---+
|/v\ Agus Budy Wuysang                   MIS Department          |
| |  Phone:  +62-21-344-1316 ext 317     GSM: +62-816-917-066    |
+--------| http://www.rad.net.id/users/personal/s/supes |--------+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Mike A. Harris: "Re: Remote fork() and Parallel Programming"
Previous message: Alex Buell: "[OFFTOPIC] glibc troubles"
Maybe in reply to: Agus Budy Wuysang: "2.0.34 bug?"