Re: Release candidate for e2fsprogs-1.12 for testing (YES)

OLK (delise@online-club.de)
Tue, 16 Jun 1998 20:18:26 +0200


Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> positive reports
Here you get one

Comparing 1.10 against 1.12-WIP on my Kamikaze-System
Am5x86-133 oc. at 160 Mhz 2.1.102 libc5-based + AIC7xxx +
good old 0.5b ext2-fs
After smooth compiling and stabily fscking on >4GB Partitions,
there is to say that 1.12 is not a *bit* faster,
the only vermouth-drop is that it's much less peak-memory
consuming.

after Pass:3 2.178.816 Bytes (1.10) ./. 217.088 Bytes (1.12)
after finishing 1.908.480 Bytes (1.10) ./. 32.768 Bytes (1.12)

Well not bad, but any patch for transforming
saved-memory into gained-speed available ? ;-)))

Bye
OLK

-- 
eMail : delise@online-club.de
Linux - dat beste Textadventure wo gibt

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu