kernel compile time comparison (2.0 vs 2.1 with 64MB)

Paolo Losi (losi@altrimedia.it)
Sat, 01 Aug 1998 17:47:16 +0000

Hello everyone,
these are the results obtained doing a full kernel compile after a
reboot (make dep,make clean,make bzImage) on a P166MMX 64Mb RAM IDE DMA
hd:

linux 2.0.36pre1+Jumbo9
524.54user 47.96system 10:35.29elapsed 90%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (261405major+309077minor)pagefaults
0swaps

linux 2.0.113
525.66user 39.60system 10:25.49elapsed 90%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata
0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (261096major+309034minor)pagefaults
0swaps

can we say that, as far as the sub-systems involved are concerned, 2.1
is 20% faster than 2.0?
Thanks
Paolo Losi

losi@altrimedia.it

P.S. if you need any replay from me please CC to me directly.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html