Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:38:26 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
Previous message: Michel Catudal: "Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113"
In reply to: Michel Catudal: "Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"

> I saw some other funny effects later and backed them out.
>
> They also break the trampolines emmited naturally by gcc.

They dont

> Alan, this and for other reasons are why I think they should be
> seperate patch sets, never in the mainline.

If the statement was remotely true it might be valid. They however dont
break selectors and dont break trampolines.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
Previous message: Michel Catudal: "Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113"
In reply to: Michel Catudal: "Re: No more connection to internet after Kernel 2.1.113"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"