Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:14:55 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"

> is odd. You're telling me that people have written interpreters that place code
> to actually execute on the stack? I've read a bit about stack machines, and

Yes they exist. They are very non portable and very messy tricks to pull but
they are used occasionally and do work. On the other hand I don't have a
single one I can find on any of my CD's unless java does it

(Notably cache coherency is only a non issue on intel CPU's)

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"