Oh.. glad you brought this one up. I've asked this before, and I'm asking
again: who had the "brilliant" idea to change the ordering in enum scsi_inos
between 2.0 and 2.1??? Breaking compatibility just for the fun of it -- and
I mean literally. It buys us nothing and it breaks scsidev big time.
I have a patch which I maintain locally for each machine using scsidev; all
it does is it changes the order back to the 2.0 one. I've submitted it in
the past and it got ignored... I'm willing to do it again, but I have a
feeling it's gonna have the same fate.
It's too bad, scsidev was a really nice application. And as someone said
on the list, some of us do have to boot back and forth between 2.0 and 2.1.
Ion
--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html