Re: DEVFSv50 and /dev/fb? (or /dev/fb/? ???)

Shawn Leas (sleas@ixion.honeywell.com)
Wed, 5 Aug 1998 17:04:13 -0500 (CDT)

On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Terry L Ridder wrote:
> > Not that I advocate devfs, but there is no denying it does sidestep
> > the issue quite nicely, but then again, there may be other
> > alternatives not so closely tied to the kernel.
>
> Alternatives are nice to have and alternatives need to be looked at.

Ok, what might be a better idea? What might be a better approach? If you
can think of a better approach, I'm certainly all ears... Really, I mean
it!

-Shawn
<=========== America Held Hostage ===========>
Day 2023 for the poor and the middle class.
Day 2042 for the rich and the dead.
899 days remaining in the Raw Deal.
<============================================>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html