Re: problem with 114 sched.* changes (not the gcc one)

Meelis Roos (mroos@tartu.cyber.ee)
Fri, 7 Aug 1998 17:26:15 +0300

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Kragen: "Re: Compiler alternatives to no-exec (was Re: non exec stack...)"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Large numbers of files."

MR> Also, when stracing it I discovered that when nfs modules had been loaded
MR> befor, it worked. Did some more tests - yes, the same. It hangs without nfs
MR> (not sure if 100%) and doesn't hang when nfs is loaded or compiled into
MR> the kernel.

Small correction: when nfs is compiled in kernel, it may still happen.

-- Meelis Roos (mroos@tartu.cyber.ee)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Kragen: "Re: Compiler alternatives to no-exec (was Re: non exec stack...)"
Previous message: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: Large numbers of files."