Re: 128MB RAM on Linux

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 21 Aug 1998 17:15:08 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [VERY OFFTOPIC] Boring dissertation on English / American languages.."
Previous message: chris@chris.symsystems.com: "RE: [A Tad Offtopic]More X IDEs"
In reply to: Martin Guindon: "Re: 128MB RAM on Linux"

> But btw, why does Linux isn't recognizing more than 64MB automatically??
> It's one of the "plus" things Windows have... :/

2.0.36pre does ;)

Its because the original IBM PC bios call for "how much memory please"
returns the number of 1K blocks in a 16bit value.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [VERY OFFTOPIC] Boring dissertation on English / American languages.."
Previous message: chris@chris.symsystems.com: "RE: [A Tad Offtopic]More X IDEs"
In reply to: Martin Guindon: "Re: 128MB RAM on Linux"