@@ -1512,14 +1512,14 @@
"%9s " /* Chain name */
"%08lX/%08lX->%08lX/%08lX " /* Source & Destination IPs */
"%.16s " /* Interface */
- "%hX %hX " /* fw_flg and fw_invflg fields */
- "%hu " /* Protocol */
+ "%X %X " /* fw_flg and fw_invflg fields */
+ "%u " /* Protocol */
"%-9u %-9u %-9u %-9u " /* Packet & byte counters */
- "%hu-%hu %hu-%hu " /* Source & Dest port ranges */
+ "%u-%u %u-%u " /* Source & Dest port ranges */
"A%02X X%02X " /* TOS and and xor masks */
"%08X " /* Redirection port */
"%u " /* fw_mark field */
- "%hu " /* output size */
+ "%u " /* output size */
"%9s\n", /* Target */
chainlabel,
ntohl(rule->ipfw.fw_src.s_addr),
I am worried that this `fix' (presumably to fix reported
/proc/net/ip_fwchains breakage on sparcs) covers up a real printk()
problem with `%hu'.
Whoever was responsible, please put my mind at ease.
Rusty.
-- .sig lost in the mail.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html