Re: Module Ideas: Persistence, PnP, and more...

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Patrik Hagglund: "Re: [TIMINGS] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower"
• Previous message: jamal: "Re: my broken TCP is faster on broken networks [Re: Very poorTCP/SACK performance]"
• Next in thread: Jauder Ho: "Re: this SUCKS."
• Reply: Jauder Ho: "Re: this SUCKS."

David Howells:
>
> Well your static binary can do { mlock, write, sleep, write, exit } to do the
> job. It'd be fairly straightforward.
>
As long as it doesn't print anything between these two write() calls...

-- 
Matthias Urlichs      |        noris network GmbH      |       smurf@noris.de
The quote was selected randomly. Really.    |      http://www.noris.de/~smurf/
-- 
HOLY MACRO!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html






 Next message: Patrik Hagglund: "Re: [TIMINGS] Re: 2.1.xxx makes Electric Fence 22x slower"
 Previous message: jamal: "Re: my broken TCP is faster on broken networks [Re: Very poorTCP/SACK performance]"

 Next in thread: Jauder Ho: "Re: this SUCKS."
 Reply: Jauder Ho: "Re: this SUCKS."