On Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:50:21 +0100, Simon Kenyon <simon@koala.ie> said:
> built 2.1.121 while running 2.0.34 and then built it again (after doing make
> clean; make xconfig; make dep) on top of the 2.1.121 previously built
> there was a 6% slowdown 9:14 vs 8:51
> is this to be expected?
> i know the test was a bit rough and ready
> is 6% statistically significant?
You tell us: run the test a couple of more times and _then_ we can tell
you what is noise in the measurement and what is significant. :)
--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/faq.html