Re: Flood ping

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 25 Sep 1998 02:15:21 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: patch cow-swapin [was Re: Very bad swap bug -- 2.0, 2.1 at least]"
Previous message: Bill Hawes: "Re: nfs_lookup_revalidate: %s fh changed"
In reply to: Justin A. Kolodziej: "Re: Interesting scheduling times - NOT"
Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: Flood ping"

> wow. this is bad. 2.1.119 has a 0% packet loss...ok, 2 drops in 64K
> packets. but 2.1.122 has a 97% packet loss.
>
> eww. what broke where?

Nothing broke anywhere, its a bug in your ping client

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: patch cow-swapin [was Re: Very bad swap bug -- 2.0, 2.1 at least]"
Previous message: Bill Hawes: "Re: nfs_lookup_revalidate: %s fh changed"
In reply to: Justin A. Kolodziej: "Re: Interesting scheduling times - NOT"
Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: Flood ping"