My current hypothesis is that since Linux VFAT source currently (before
the patches) also accepts zero as end-of-filename symbol, it may actually
generate them as well under some conditions. I haven't tested this
hypothesis or if the VFAT code does same without the patch (Also a
possibility), as I'm a bit swamped atm.
But until I or somebody else does, I would recommend against using those
patches on anything critical...
Thanks ;)
-Donwulff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/