On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 1998, Jim Bauer wrote:
>
> > I tried several different things to track down this problem.
> > My results are posted below.
> >
> > This is with 2.1.127 non-SMP compiled with gcc 2.7.2.3
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
This both applies to me, too.
> Maybe this is the thing the promlematic systems have in
> common, or the fact that they're running libc5 (although
> I don't know what that could have to do with it)...
I nearly exclusively run glibc binaries on my system, so this may not be the
point. Despite this, instability due to a user level library would have to be
solved before releasing 2.1.X as a stable kernel (if this were the case).
Nils
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nils Philippsen @college: nils@fht-esslingen.de Vogelsangstrasse 115 @home: nils@wombat.dialup.fht-esslingen.de D 70197 Stuttgart phone: +49-711-6599405 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Maybe I should patent stupidity so every lawyer will owe me BIG !! (mpare/at/cadvision/dot/com)
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/