Re: Linux-asm (was A patch for linux 2.1.127)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Vladimir Dergachev: "Re: Question about linux drivers"
• Previous message: Ben McCann: "Re: new processes very slow on otherwise responsive system (2.1."

> Change : 0.82 times faster <------- ;-)

On my system, PPro 180, gcc-2.7.2.3 I get Richards asm
code to be 1.15 times faster than your patched C code.
What were you using?

That's still pretty good, though. According to my tests,
that makes your unrolled C code faster than the i386 asm
we have in the kernel now (by about 15%).

--
There's really no way to fix this, and still keep Perl pathologically eclectic
--
Erik Corry erik@arbat.com           Ceterum censeo, Microsoftem esse delendam!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/






 Next message: Vladimir Dergachev: "Re: Question about linux drivers"
 Previous message: Ben McCann: "Re: new processes very slow on otherwise responsive system (2.1."