2. I'm wondering why we don't use asm/string-486.h for
486+ machines instead of asm/string.h? The first is floating
around for a long time, routines in it are faster, but nobody
use them. My last(2.1.12[78]) kernels were compiled with the
string routines from asm/string-486.h and there were no problems
at all.
regards
-- Petko Manolov - petkan@varel.bg http://www.varel.bg/~petkan- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/