> > I will compile a new patch (against 2.1.130 again, since
> > 2.1.131 contains mostly VM mistakes that I want reversed)
> > this weekend...
>
> 2.1.131 is materially faster here than any of the variants I've
> tried. Are you sure ?
Sure it's faster. It just doesn't come near the
auto balancing that could have been (and appears
to be in my tree).
cheers,
Rik -- the flu hits, the flu hits, the flu hits -- MORE
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/