Sigh...
You benchmarked two different drives under different OSes on
different machines and try to extend those results to a general
performance difference between SCSI and IDE...
(sounds rather rediculous when viewed this way, doesn't it)
This is simply not a proper benchmark for the results you want
to achieve. If you want to prove that IDE gives you more bang
for the buck, you should get a machine and use a SCSI subsystem
and an IDE subsystem which cost about the same amount of money
_in that same machine_ and test _using the same OS_ and the
_same workload_. Furthermore, you should be using a realistic
workload and not one that's been tuned to give the result you
want.
regards,
Rik -- the flu hits, the flu hits, the flu hits -- MORE
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Linux memory management tour guide. H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl |
| Scouting Vries cubscout leader. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~riel/ |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/