> NFS mail is faster (because of the kernel cacheing) :-)
Doubtful. With the right mailbox format, IMAP is significantly faster for
large inboxes and folders. I have users that like keeping several hundred
megs in their inboxes. Try reading mail with an NFS based mail. Good luck.
=)
> POP & IMAP don't work with all useful mail clients
Unfortunately that is true but hopefully NFS based mail clients will
either go away or come to their senses.
> You can use fetchmail, but then you don't have roving access to your spool
> (unless your home directory is NFS-mounted)
IMAP leaves everything on the server. That's true roaming for me. I can
leave a mail session open at work, go home and open another mail session
over a slow connection without any problems. I'm sure you won't want to
try to do NFS over a slow connection?
> If your home directory is NFS-mounted (any *many* are), the same
> problems as with an NFS mail spool apply.
>
> So it still has to be fixed.
Note I didn't say it shouldn't be fixed. What I said was using NFS based
mailers was braindead. I guess this is now at least quite a bit offtopic.
I'm more than happy to continue this in private discussion or on
linux-apps (there's one right? I don't remember).
--Jauder
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/