Re: [OFFTOPIC] Y2k compliance

Martin Mares (mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz)
Tue, 8 Dec 1998 11:31:04 +0100


Hello,

> Except cal also shows Feb 29, 1000 as existing

Perfectly correct -- according to Julian calendar used at that time,
all years divisible by four were leap years.

Have a nice fortnight

-- 
Martin `MJ' Mares   <mj@ucw.cz>   http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/
Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth
"Unexpected ';', expecting ';'."

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/