Re: [OFFTOPIC] Y2k compliance

J. S. Connell (ankh@canuck.gen.nz)
Tue, 8 Dec 1998 09:33:47 -0500 (EST)


On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Mike Sackton wrote:

> Except cal also shows Feb 29, 1000 as existing

It would've existed, since under the Julian system there was a leap year
every four years, whether we needed it or not. =)

--Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/