Re: any chance of getting Solaris x86 fs support in 2.0.x?

Jeremy Hansen (jeremy@xxedgexx.com)
Thu, 10 Dec 1998 15:16:52 -0500 (EST)

Heh, I ended up using 2.1.131 and it worked perfect :-). I don't know
what my problem was. I was just *scared* I guess cause I haven't even
touched a devel kernel since like 2.1.20 or something.

I have been enlightened. Man I can't wait 'til 2.2.x is ready. So much
great shit in the new kernels :-)

Thanks
-jeremy

> > >
> > > I'm coming here for help because I'm kinda in a situation which would
> > > greatly benefit from being able to do the above. ANY chance of this???
> > > I'm no kernel hacker, so saying, "yeah just do take it out of 2.1.x" isn't
> > > going to help.
> >
> > Isn't the Solaris filesystem called ufs? Isn't ufs already supported by the
> > kernel? (mount -t ufs ...)
>
> Yeah, I'm not sure why he can't just use the latest 2.1 kernel :/
>
> --
> ----- -- - -------- --------- ---- ------- ----- - - --- --------
> Ben Collins <b.m.collins@larc.nasa.gov> Debian GNU/Linux
> UnixGroup Admin - Jordan Systems Inc. bcollins@debian.org
> ------ -- ----- - - ------- ------- -- The Choice of the GNU Generation
>

http://www.xxedgexx.com | jeremy@xxedgexx.com
| pgp available from:
| http://www.xxedgexx.com/pgp.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/